According to Odaily, in response to OpenAI's plan to terminate its partnership with SpaceX after acquiring Cursor and to stop Cursor's direct access to OpenAI models on November 12, Musk stated that he "doesn't care at all." Musk then further criticized OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and co-founder Greg Brockman, calling them "completely untrustworthy" and accusing them of "stealing from an open-source nonprofit." The long-standing conflict between Musk and OpenAI has once again escalated publicly.

Six months after the initial military strikes by the US and Israel against Iran, the impact of the war continues to reverberate globally, severely dividing the large Iranian-American community in the United States. Some anti-Iranian figures welcomed the military action, hoping it would bring about regime change; others, concerned about civilian casualties and regional instability, oppose any form of external military intervention. Arezo Rashidian, a long-time supporter of former Iranian Crown Prince Reza Pahlavi, stated that many who initially supported the military action are now disappointed, saying, "The hoped-for regime change has not occurred." She noted that as the fighting subsides, security controls within Iran are being tightened again, and the public is becoming more cautious about discussing politics and participating in protests. Meanwhile, anti-war activists argue that some Iranian-Americans who supported military intervention had unrealistic expectations about the war's outcome and underestimated the lessons learned from wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Libya. The war has not only failed to bridge the political divide among Iranians overseas but has also further exacerbated distrust between different generations and politically divided communities. As the United States continues to intensify economic pressure on Iran, and Tehran warns of possible further retaliatory measures, the divisions within overseas Iranian communities regarding the next steps in the war and Iran's future continue to widen.

Odaily Planet Daily reports that New York State officials are warning that AI-generated content and fake crypto projects are making investment scams more deceptive. Investment scam losses exceeded $8 billion in 2025, a 38% increase from 2024, with 144,041 consumers reporting losses and a median loss of $10,560. AI can be used to clone voices, forge videos, impersonate financial professionals, and create social media ads. New York Attorney General Letitia James has warned that scammers lure investors with celebrity deepfake endorsements, fake cryptocurrencies, pump-and-dump schemes, and fake trading platforms. Some fake platforms display fabricated account balances, earnings, and transaction records, allowing victims to make small withdrawals to build trust before demanding additional funds or fees. New York State officials advise consumers to verify the identity of promoters, companies, and investment projects, and to confirm the destination of funds. FBI data shows that reported cybercrime losses amounted to $20.877 billion in 2025, with $11.37 billion of those losses involving cryptocurrencies. Common signs of scams include promises of high returns, unsolicited investment opportunities, pressure selling, and projects lacking clear documentation. (Bitcoin.com News)

According to Odaily Planet Daily, six Bitcoin wallets that had been inactive since 2011-2014 transferred a total of 553.59 BTC, worth approximately $40 million, between August 16th and 26th. Five of these wallets sent funds to addresses with no known exchange affiliation, while only one wallet transferred 40 BTC to the German crypto custody and trading service provider Boerse Stuttgart Digital. Galaxy Research data shows that the amount of dormant Bitcoin on-chain movement fell to its lowest level since 2022 in the second quarter of this year, and the total movement for 2026 is expected to be less than half of last year's. Alex Thorn, head of research at Galaxy Research, stated that he has not yet found any whale clients he has contacted who chose to sell Bitcoin due to quantum computing risks, but some institutional investors have indeed postponed their purchases as a result. (CoinDesk)