BlockBeats reports that on September 6, the public relations department of Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps issued a statement saying that the Revolutionary Guard Air Force launched multiple ballistic missiles, striking a US aircraft carrier and a destroyer. The targeted US warships were involved in the naval blockade of Iran and interfered with Iranian vessels. The statement indicated that both US warships were forced to withdraw from the conflict zone after suffering losses. (Xinhua)

Conflicts continue in several parts of the Middle East today, with the US military and the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps sinking each other's oil tankers. The US Central Command confirmed sinking three Iranian Revolutionary Guard oil tankers, while Iran claimed to have struck three vessels suspected of being US-related and three oil tankers, disrupting shipping in the Strait of Hormuz.

According to BlockBeats, on September 6th, based on official data, Hyperliquid bought and burned 9,730 HYPE tokens in the past 24 hours at an average price of $85.27, worth approximately $829,500.

To date, Hyperliquid has burned a total of 48.42 million HYPE tokens, worth approximately $4.14 billion at current prices, representing about 4.84% of the maximum supply.

According to BlockBeats, on September 6, Arbitrum founder Steven Goldfeder and Solana co-founder Toly debated Robinhood Chain's fee model.

As an Ethereum L2 blockchain built on Arbitrum Orbit, Robinhood Chain is required to share 10% of its net protocol revenue with the Arbitrum ecosystem, of which 8% goes to the DAO treasury, 2% to the development fund, and Robinhood retains approximately 90%. Recently, Robinhood's on-chain fees have surged, with the average single GAS transaction reaching approximately $0.40, and daily fees reaching millions of dollars, far exceeding the typically very low fees of Solana.

Solana co-founder Toly believes that the 10% commission paid to Arbitrum is more than four times the transaction fees on Solana for equivalent transactions. If Robinhood Chain had been built on Solana, Robinhood could have offered users a completely gas-free experience. Front-end developers should earn money within their own apps, not by profiting from underlying network congestion causing price increases. Toly calls Robinhood Chain's model "brain dead." Toly counters Goldfeder's question: Why can't the app itself charge users? Does reducing congestion and scaling necessarily mean sacrificing revenue?

Arbitrum co-founder Steven Goldfede stated that Toly's viewpoint is absurd. On Arbitrum, Robinhood retains 90% of the gas fees; on Solana, the underlying fees go to validators or the network, with Robinhood keeping 0%. If they were to offer users fully gas-free service, they would have to pay for it themselves. Robinhood chose Arbitrum to act as a landlord, not a tenant. They want to control their sorting mechanism and pocket the majority of the fees.